Commentary for Eruvin 63:8
ורב נחמן התם כדרב שמעיה דאמר רב שמעיה חזקה אין ב"ד של כהנים עומדים משם עד שיכלו כל מעות שבשופר
- There [the presumption may be justified] in agreement with the view of R'Shemaiah. For R'Shemaiah laid down: There is a legal presumption that no Beth din of priest who would rise from their session<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., from there'.');"><sup>24</sup></span> before all the money in the collecting box<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra n. 6.');"><sup>25</sup></span> had been spent.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On the purchase of the necessary sacrifices. Pes. 90b. The ruling in this case is consequently no proof that a similar presumption is justified where the mission is entrusted to an ordinary agent.');"><sup>26</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Eruvin 63:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.