Commentary for Eruvin 77:2

ולא היא שמע ליה ולא הדר ביה התם מוכחא מילתא הכא לאו מוכחא מילתא היא

as soon [as the holy day terminates],' he would have changed his view.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because, from this Baraitha it is obvious that, on a holy day' even a walk is forbidden if the purpose is to facilitate some forbidden act. Similarly in the case of 'erub, if the utterance of the formula would constitute an infringement of the law of preparation the silent occupation of the required spot for the same purpose would equally constitute an infringement.');">⁴</span> This however is not correct. He did in fact hear of this ruling but did not change his view, since there<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The walks in the Baraitha cited.');">⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 77:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.