Commentary for Eruvin 82:1

דאי סלקא דעתך אכולהו הא בעי מיניה רבה מרב יהודה ולא פשט ליה

for if it could have been presumed that the reference is to all the days mentioned [the objection would arise:] Did not Rabbah ask [a question<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Whether a fast on a Sabbath eve must be completed.');">¹</span> on the subject] from Rab Judah and the latter did not answer him?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra 40b ad fin. If the Sabbath eve is included among the days on which a fast must be completed Rab Judah who reported the ruling in the name of Rab (v. loc. cit.) would, surely, have been able to give Rabbah an answer.');">²</span> - But according to your view<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the Sabbath eve is excluded from the ruling reported by Rab Judah in the name of Rab.');">³</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 82:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.