Commentary for Eruvin 93:24

אלא בבית הפרס דרבנן

seeing that it had already been laid down that 'in a dispute between R'Meir and R'Jose the halachah is in agreement with R'Jose'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' None whatever. Since R. Johanan, however, found it necessary in this particular instance to state specifically that the halachah agreed with R. Jose it follows that the general rules on the halachah (supra 46b) are spurious and, as R. Mesharsheya stated, were to be disregarded.');">⁵⁸</span> - But what is really the difficulty? Is it not possible [that R'Johanan<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In his specific ruling in the case under discussion.');">⁵⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 93:24. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.