Commentary for Eruvin 97:16
ואי אשמעינן הכא משום דפלגיה מיפלג אבל התם אימא לא צריכא
In agreement with whose view?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Did Samuel give this ruling.');"><sup>27</sup></span> Is it in agreement with that of Beth Shammai, since it was taught: If five residents collected their 'erub and deposited it in two receptacles, their 'erub, Beth Shammai ruled, is invalid and Beth Hillel ruled: Their 'erub is valid?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra 48b q.v. notes. Now, is it likely that Samuel would rule in agreement with Beth Shammai contrary to the ruling of Beth Hillel which is the accepted halachah?');"><sup>28</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Eruvin 97:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.