Commentary for Gittin 146:12

כמאן אזלא הא דאמר רבה בר בר חנה א"ר יוחנן מחלוקת כשראוה שנבעלה אבל לא ראוה שנבעלה דברי הכל אינה צריכה הימנו גט כמאן

we still suspect he may have betrothed her. On which of these views can we justify the statement of Rabbah b. Bar Hanah in the name of R. Johanan: 'The difference arises where they saw her have intercourse, but if they did not see her have intercourse, both sides agree that she does not require from him a second Get?' On whose view is this justified? — On neither.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since the first Tanna does not require a second Get even where she was seen, and R. Jose requires it even where she was not seen. ');">¹¹</span>

Explore commentary for Gittin 146:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.