Commentary for Gittin 161:18

<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> אמר רבה בר בר חנה א"ר יוחנן מחלוקת בשראוה שנבעלה

imposes the liability, as it says, That they may eat within thy gates and be filled.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ibid. 12. ');">¹⁶</span> <b><i>MISHNAH</i></b>. IF A MAN HAS DIVORCED HIS WIFE AND THEN STAYS WITH HER OVER NIGHT IN AN INN, BETH SHAMMAI SAY THAT SHE DOES NOT REQUIRE FROM HIM A SECOND GET, BUT BETH HILLEL SAY THAT SHE DOES REQUIRE A SECOND GET FROM HIM. THIS, HOWEVER, IS ONLY WHEN THE DIVORCE IS ONE AFTER MARRIAGE; [FOR BETH HILLEL] AGREE THAT IF THE DIVORCE IS ONE AFTER BETROTHAL,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Glos. s.v. Erusin. ');">¹⁷</span> SHE DOES NOT REQUIRE A SECOND GET FROM HIM, BECAUSE HE WOULD NOT [YET] TAKE LIBERTIES WITH HER. <b><i>GEMARA</i></b>. Rabbah b. Bar Hanah said in the name of R. Johanan: The difference of opinion [recorded here] relates only to the case where she was seen to have intercourse,

Explore commentary for Gittin 161:18. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.