Commentary for Gittin 173:20

דכתב ראובן בן אקמא ויעקב עד אבתרא

<b><i>GEMARA</i></b>. Why should not one be rendered valid by the signature Reuben [under it] and the other by the signature 'son of Jacob witness'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., supposing the signature is 'Reuben son of Jacob' and 'Reuben' comes under the first Get on the right and son of Jacob' under the second on the left. We can then suppose that we have two distinct signatures, one for each Get. ');">¹⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Gittin 173:20. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.