Commentary for Gittin 52:7

ומקום הזמן: קפסיק ותני לא שנא מן הנישואין ולא שנא מן האירוסין

In [a Get which dissolves] a betrothal, however, the regulation certainly is reasonable on the view that the date is required to prevent a man shielding his sister's daughter, but on the view that it is required on account of the usufruct — does the law of usufruct apply to a betrothed woman?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' There are no provisions entitling the bridegroom to the usufruct of his bride's property. ');">⁶</span>

Explore commentary for Gittin 52:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.