Commentary for Gittin 59:12
ופוסק עמהן כשער הזול ואין בו משום רבית ואין שביעית משמטתו
'Ulla said: This ruling is based on the view of R. Jose, who said that [in many places] possession is reckoned to have been acquired though strictly speaking it has not been acquired.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. infra 59b, and B.M. 12b. ');"><sup>9</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Gittin 59:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.