Commentary for Keritot 33:31

נדות

But according to Rab Hisda, who explained that his query [referred to the case where the act was performed] in ignorance of the Sabbath but with knowledge of its prohibition, [and that the question was] whether the intervening week-days effected a division or not, how [can such a query as to] whether the intervening days effect a division or not apply to one menstruant woman? - Raba answered: For instance, he united with her [the menstruant] and she then immersed herself; she again became unclean<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit. 'she saw' sc. blood.');">²⁰</span>

Explore commentary for Keritot 33:31. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.