Commentary for Keritot 54:19

מאי לא מעל ולא כיפר

I might further think th he does not fulfil [his obligation] with an animal which he had set apart for himself, albeit for an offence of equal gravity, since [we know that] if he set apart an animal as an offering for his eating forbidden fat and brought it as an offering for his eating blood, or vice versa, he has thereby not been guilty of misappropriation<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. infra, next paragraph and notes.');">⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Keritot 54:19. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.