Commentary for Keritot 7:58

שפיר קא"ל

Said Rami son of Hama to R'Hisda: It is right that where the portions were of one designation but consumed under two spells of unawareness one should be liable to two offerings, because [the break in] the spell of unawareness effected a division [between the two meals], but why should one be liable to two offerings in the case where the portions were of different designations and consumed under one spell of unawareness?

Explore commentary for Keritot 7:58. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.