Commentary for Ketubot 103:10

אלא לעולם דאדרה איהו ואביי מתרץ לטעמיה ורבא מתרץ לטעמיה אביי מתרץ לטעמיה אלמנה לכהן גדול כולי עלמא לא פליגי דחייב לפדותה ממזרת ונתינה לישראל כולי עלמא לא פליגי דאינו חייב לפדותה מדיר אשת כהן נמי כולי עלמא לא פליגי דחייב לפדותה דהיינו אלמנה [לכ"ג]

Rather [here it is indeed a case where] the husband made the vow against her, and Abaye explains [the tannaitic dispute] on the lines of his view while Rava explains it on the lines of his view. Abaye explains the dispute in line with his view: If a widow [was married] to a High Priest no one disputes that the husband must redeem her; If a mamzeret or a netinah [was married] to an Israelite no one disputes that he does not have to redeem her, Also one who made a vow against the wife of a priest no one disputes that he must redeem her, since [the principle in this case] is identical with that of a widow [who was married] to a High Priest.

Explore commentary for Ketubot 103:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.