Commentary for Kiddushin 104:13

תנו רבנן לאחר פטירתו של ר' מאיר אמר להם רבי יהודה לתלמידיו אל יכנסו תלמידי רבי מאיר לכאן מפני שקנתרנים הם ולא ללמוד תורה הם באים אלא לקפחני בהלכות הם באים דחק סומכוס ונכנס אמר להם כך שנה לי ר' מאיר המקדש בחלקו בין קדשי קדשים ובין קדשים קלים לא קידש

then he shall bring his guilt-offering]:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. V, 21. The trespass referred to is repudiation of liability with a false oath.');">²⁴</span> this is to include lower grade sacrifices as his [the individual's] property:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If one swears falsely that he did not vow a peace-offering, which is of the lower sanctity, he incurs this sacrifice. Though this law does not hold good in respect to God's property (deduced from, 'and deal falsely with his neighbour' ibid.) , the phrase 'against the Lord' shews that even where there is an element of sanctity this sacrifice is involved. Hence it includes lower grade sacrifices, and thus teaches that these rank as the individual's property; this contradicts the ruling of the MISHNAH:');">²⁵</span> this is R'Jose the Galilean's opinion! - You may even say that it agrees with R'Jose the Galilean: he stated [that view] only whilst it [the animal to be sacrificed] is alive, but not after it is killed.

Explore commentary for Kiddushin 104:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.