Commentary for Kiddushin 108:7
מ"ט דב"ה גמרי (ויקרא יט, כד) קודש (ויקרא כז, לב) קודש ממעשר מה מעשר יש לו חומש ויש לו ביעור אף כרם רבעי יש לו חומש ויש לו ביעור וב"ש לא גמרי קודש קודש ממעשר
While Beth Shammai do not deduce the meaning of 'holy' from tithe. Now, when Beth Hillel rule that it is as [the second-] tithe, with whom do they hold? If with R'Judah, why is it all for the vault, but he maintains that the [second-] tithe is secular property?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' With respect to fallings and gleanings it is written: Lev. XIX, 10: and thou shalt not glean thy vineyard, neither shalt thou gather the fallen fruit of thy vineyard. 'Thy' excludes sacred property, which is God's. But if Beth Hillel agree with R. Judah, second-tithe is secular, and since fourth year vintage is assimilated thereto, that also is likewise.');"><sup>13</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Kiddushin 108:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.