Commentary for Kiddushin 13:10

ואי אשמועינן ממונא משום דאיתיהיב למחילה אבל קידושין אימא לא צריכא :

R'Ashi objected to Mar Zutra: If so, property which ranks as security [real estate] is acquired as an adjunct to property which does not rank as security [movables];<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A creditor could collect his debt out of the debtor's real estate, even if sold after the debt was contracted, but not out of movables, if sold; hence the former is termed property which ranks as security, the latter, property which does not rank as security. Human beings are on a par with the former, and R. Ashi assumed that the woman is acquired in conjunction with the maneh.');">¹⁰</span> whereas we learnt the reverse: Property which does not rank as security may be acquired in conjunction with property which ranks as security by money, deed, or hazakah?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. infra ');">¹¹</span>

Explore commentary for Kiddushin 13:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.