Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Makkot 27:2

רבי יצחק אומר חייבי כריתות בכלל היו ולמה יצאת כרת באחותו לדונו בכרת ולא במלקות

Rebbi Yitzhak says, Liabilities of kares were included [in the Torah's prohibition of malkus], only why was kares repeated by [the prohibition of cohabiting with] his sister [kares b'achoso]? To punish him with kares and not malkus.

Explore commentary for Makkot 27:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse