Commentary for Meilah 17:5
אחד חטאת העוף ואחד עולת העוף שמלקן ומיצה דמן חוץ למקומן פסול ואין בו כרת חוץ לזמנן פיגול וחייבין עליו כרת
The father of Samuel raised an objection to R'Huna: Both in the case of the sin-offering of a bird and in that of t burnt offering of a bird if the neck was pinched or the blood drained out while purposing an act outside the proper place, the offering is invalid but one is not liable to the penalty of extinction; if while purposing an act beyond its proper time, it is piggul, and one is liable to extinction.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Zeb. 64b.');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Meilah 17:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.