Commentary for Menachot 157:12
והדר ביה רבה לגביה דרבא מדהדר ביה רבי אליעזר לגביה דרבי יהושע
And the other?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So MS.M., Rashi MS. and Sh. Mek. The question is against R. Judah in his report of R. Eliezer's view, that where the animal is found after the slaughtering to have a blemish the bread is not hallowed. Why should not the bread be hallowed seeing that we are speaking of a minor blemish? In some texts the reading is 'And R. Judah?' and in others 'and R. Joshua?'.');"><sup>8</sup></span> - He will reply, It is only when [the blemish] affects the validity of [the animal] itself [as a sacrifice] that R'Akiba says that if they brought up they must not be taken down, but he does not say so where it affects the hallowing of the bread.
Explore commentary for Menachot 157:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.