Commentary for Menachot 157:2
אמר רבי יהודה לא נחלקו רבי אליעזר ור' יהושע על ששחטה ונמצאת טריפה שלא קדש ועל חוץ לזמנו שקדש ועל בעל מום שלא קדש ועל מה נחלקו על חוץ למקומו שר' אליעזר אומר קדש ורבי יהושע אומר לא קדש
R'Judah said, R'Eliezer and R'Joshua do not dispute the ruling<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cur. edd. insert here: 'that if he slaughtered it and it was found to be trefah the bread is not hallowed'. It is not found in the MSS. or in Tosefta Men. VIII. It is deleted here by Sh. Mek.');"><sup>1</sup></span> that [if at the slaughtering there was an intention of eating thereof] outside its proper time the bread is hallowed,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For this is a case of piggul, and with piggul it is essential that the remaining services be regarded as validly performed, otherwise the penalty of piggul would not be incurred. Accordingly the bread is undoubtedly hallowed by the slaughtering.');"><sup>2</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Menachot 157:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.