Commentary for Menachot 158:7

אבל אין זבח זבוח באותה שעה מאי נפסל בלינה אדתני סיפא אם לאו יפסלו בלינה ליפלוג וליתני בדידה במה דברים אמורים שהיתה זבח זבוח באותה שעה אבל אין זבח זבוח באותה שעה לא

Then instead of teaching the final clause, BUT IF NOT, THEY ARE LEFT TO BECOME INVALID BY REMAINING OVERNIGHT, [the Tanna] could have drawn a distinction in that [first clause] thus: That is so<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the drink-offerings may be used for another animal-offering.');">⁸</span> only where the other animal-offering had been slaughtered at the same time, but not where the other animal-offering had not been slaughtered at the same time! - That is just what [the Tanna] meant to say, That is so only where the other animal-offering had been slaughtered at the same time, but where the other animal-offering had not been slaughtered at the same time, [the drink-offerings] are invalid for they are regarded as though they had remained overnight.

Explore commentary for Menachot 158:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.