Commentary for Menachot 160:11

סימן למודי"ם מיד"ת על"ה שי"ש שכ"ן דדמ"ה דא"י חל"ש מות"ר תמור"ה בחו"ץ חזקי"ה הפרי"ש חטא"ת לאח"ר יות"ר

But if he had said, 'Behold I take upon myself [to offer a thank-offering]'. he cannot do otherwise than bring it.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The third was brought to replace the second, but as the second was not offered the third cannot be regarded as the surplus of the thank-offering, but rather as an additional thank-offering which requires the bread-offering.');">⁴</span> then let him bring another animal and the bread-offering [of a thank-offering] with it and declare, 'If th surviving [animal] is the substitute, then let this be a thank-offering and this its bread-offering; and if the surviving [animal] is the [original] thank-offering, then let this be the bread-offering for it and this [animal be as security'!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And where an animal is brought together with the thank-offering as security against its loss it does not require the bread-offering.');">¹⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Menachot 160:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.