Commentary for Menachot 210:7

שמעינן ליה לר' שמעון דאמר אם הביא עשרון אחד משני עשרונות ולוג אחד משני לוגין יצא

he permitted it only where it had actually been done but not in the first instance', that distinction applies only to peace-offerings, since [the effect of the conditions expressed is] to reduce th time allowed for the eating,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Guilt-offerings may be eaten only on the day of the offering and the night following, whereas peace-offerings may be eaten during two days and one night. Where therefore a guilt-offering was confused with peace-offerings and each animal is taken and offered according to the restrictions of the two kinds of offerings, the flesh thereof would only be eaten during the shorter period and what was left over would be burnt perhaps unnecessarily.');">⁹</span> and so consecrated food is rendered invalid [before its time]; but in the case of meal-offerings<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For all meal-offerings are alike in that they must be eaten the same day and the night following.');">¹⁰</span>

Explore commentary for Menachot 210:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.