Commentary for Menachot 27:9

ועוד הא אמר רב אשי ת"ש רבי אומר משום רבי יוסי פיגל בדבר הנעשה בחוץ פיגל בדבר הנעשה בפנים לא פיגל

But if you merely say that he adopted the view of the Rabbis, rejecting only the view of R'Meir, why then the expression 'It must be'? Moreover R'Ashi had raised an objection [against R'Huna from the following]: Come and hear: Rabbi says in the name of R'Jose, If<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This refers to the bullocks and the he-goats that were to be wholly burnt (Lev. IV, 1-12; 13-21; XVI, 3 and 5; Num. XV, 24) . The procedure in these offerings (v. Zeb. V, 2) was as follows: the animals were slaughtered outside in the courtyard; the blood was sprinkled inside the Temple, i.e., on the veil and on the golden altar; the sacrificial portions, i.e., the entire beast, were burnt outside upon the outer altar; and the residue of the blood was poured out at the western base of the outer altar which stood in the Temple courtyard.');">¹¹</span>

Explore commentary for Menachot 27:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.