Commentary for Menachot 28:16

בזך אטו בזך חבירו

and they declare invalid the case [where the wrongful intention was expressed during the burning] of one dish of frankincense as a precautionary measure against the case [where the wrongful intention was expressed during the burning] of the other dish too.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which is admittedly a real case of piggul.');">²⁰</span> In our case, however, is there ever a case of [a wrongful intention expressed during the service of] half a mattir in respect of half [the minimum quantity for] eating [that renders piggul], so that we should take here precautionary measures?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' There is no such case, hence there is no ground for a precautionary measure.');">²¹</span>

Explore commentary for Menachot 28:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.