Commentary for Menachot 31:5

<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> אמר רב מחלוקת שנתן את הקומץ בשתיקה ואת הלבונה במחשבה

the handful in silence and then the frankincense with the expressed intention, but where he offered the handful with the expressed intention and then the frankincense in silence, all agree that it is piggul, for everything that a man does [in silence] h does in accordance with his first resolve.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And as his first resolve expressed during the offering of the handful was an intention of piggul-namely, of eating the remainder on the morrow - it is to be assumed that such was also his intention-though unexpressed during the offering of the frankincense.');">⁷</span> But Samuel said, There is still a dispute in that case too.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' MS.M. adds: And so also said R. Johanan, There is still a dispute in that case too.');">⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Menachot 31:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.