Commentary for Menachot 94:16

הכי קא אמינא יש לך דבר שנראה לשמו ונדחה מלשמו ואינו כשר לשמו וכשר שלא לשמו

but they differ only in the case where they were brought in again, R'Eliezer adopting Rabbi's view that the slaughtering hallows them, consequently they have become invalid by their having been taken outside, whereas R'Akiba adopts the view of R'Eleazar son of R'Simeon that the slaughtering does not hallow them, consequently they have not become invalid by their having been taken outside! - How can this be?

Explore commentary for Menachot 94:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.