Commentary for Nedarim 163:3
אמר שמואל משמיה דלוי כל נדרים בעל מפר לאשתו חוץ מן הנאתי על פלוני שאינו מפר אבל הנאת פלוני עלי מפר
This proves that it is [only] a matter affecting their mutual relationship! — [No.] This is asked according to the Rabbis, whereas 'May I be removed from the Jews' is the teaching of R. Jose [only]. For R. Huna said: This entire chapter states the ruling of R. Jose. Whence is this deduced? Since the Mishnah teaches, R. JOSE SAID: THESE ARE NOT VOWS OF SELF-DENIAL, why state again HE CAN ANNUL: THIS IS R. JOSE'S OPINION? It therefore follows that from this onward [the author] is R. Jose.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The Talmud leaves the problem unsolved and proceeds to another subject. ');"><sup>3</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Nedarim 163:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.