Commentary for Nedarim 59:3

איתמר נמי אמר רבי אמי אמר רבי יוחנן לא שנו אלא שפדאן הוא אבל פדאום אחרים אין חוזרות וקדושות

This the first the former is duly effective, I would think that it is so even if this concurrent sanctity was imposed only in a supplementary statement. Hence the need for the second clause, viz., that if the second sanctity was not (at the very outset) imposed concurrently with the first, it cannot come into effect. roused R. Jeremiah, and he said to them, Why do you compare redemption by the owner to redemption by others? Thus did R. Johanan say: If he himself redeems them, they revert to their sanctity; but if others redeem them, they do not.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For since they are redeemed by others, they are no longer under the authority of their first owner, therefore his first declaration is no longer valid. ');">³</span>

Explore commentary for Nedarim 59:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.