Commentary for Niddah 112:27

יבש היה ומיא נפיל עליה

for it might be assumed that it was already dry but water had fallen upon it. But can it not be assumed in the case of a dead creeping thing also that it was already dry but water had fallen upon it? — If that were the case it would have been completely dismembered.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The assumption can, therefore, be applied to a bloodstain only. ');">²⁴</span>

Explore commentary for Niddah 112:27. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.