Commentary for Niddah 118:31

אבל בספק ספקא לא אמר

of R: Jose who laid down that the woman is clean even where only one doubt is involved. But, instead of disputing about such a case involving only one doubt in order to inform you how far reaching is the ruling of R. Jose, why should they not dispute about a case involving a double doubt in order to inform you how far reaching is the ruling of R. Meir?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who even in such a case regards the woman as unclean. ');">²⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Niddah 118:31. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.