Commentary for Niddah 35:19
והאיכא תשע צפרדעין ושרץ אחד ביניהם ונגע באחד מהן ואינו יודע באיזה מהן נגע ברה"י ספקו טמא ברה"ר ספקו טהור ובנמצא הלך אחר הרוב
meat is found,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that the meat did not come from a fixed place. ');"><sup>36</sup></span> the majority rule is to be followed?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Hul. 95a; and, since the majority of the shops sold meat that was ritually killed, the meat found is also regarded as ritually fit. Now since this provides another instance of a doubtful case that, by reason of the majority rule, is regarded as a certainty, why did R. Johanan mention three instances only? ');"><sup>37</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Niddah 35:19. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.