Commentary for Niddah 56:2
לימא מסייע ליה
view? [For it was taught:] 'If a <i>tumtum</i> or an androginos observed a white,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For notes v. supra on Rab's statement. ');"><sup>3</sup></span> or a red discharge, he incurs no obligation of an offering for entering the Sanctuary nor is <i>terumah</i> to be burnt on his account. If he observed a simultaneous discharge of white and red he incurs indeed no obligation of an offering for entering the Sanctuary but <i>terumah</i> must be burnt on his account'. Now is not the reason<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For the first ruling (cf. supra n. 14). Lit., 'what is the reason? Not?' ');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Niddah 56:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.