Commentary for Niddah 56:33

והא גבי ערכין דכתיב {ויקרא כז } הזכר ותניא

but no <i>tumtum</i> or androginos. As it might have been presumed that he is not subject to the valuation of a man but is subject to that of a woman it was explicitly stated. 'The male<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. prev. n., emphasis on 'the'. ');">⁵⁵</span> … And if it be a female'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XXVII, 4, emphasis on 'if'. ');">⁵⁶</span>

Explore commentary for Niddah 56:33. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.