Commentary for Niddah 6:24
אמר ליה
it was Hillel who erred. He thought that Shammai's reason was that if any blood had been there it would have flowed out earlier and, therefore, he raised an objection against him from the case of the basket,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where it is not assumed (on the analogy of the blood of the menstruant) that if a creeping thing had been there it would have come out together with the objects when the basket had been cleared. ');"><sup>20</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Niddah 6:24. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.