Commentary for Niddah 66:15
אמר
UNCLEANNESS IS ONLY OF A DOUBTFUL NATURE, from which it is evident that <i>terumah</i> is not burnt in a case of doubt. But have we not learnt to the contrary: In six doubtful cases of uncleanness is <i>terumah</i> burnt [and one of them is] the doubtful uncleanness of the clothes of an 'am ha-arez?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That came in contact with the terumah; Toh. IV, 5. As a Samaritan is presumably in the same category why is the terumah spoken of in our Mishnah not to be burnt? ');"><sup>15</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Niddah 66:15. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.