Commentary for Niddah 69:31
תא שמע רבי יצחק אומר
Consequently it must be for the purpose of uncleanness. And since the final clause refers to an examination in regard to uncleanness must not the first clause also refer to one for uncleanness?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra n. 3, ');"><sup>27</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Niddah 69:31. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.