Commentary for Niddah 70:2
אימת
Now when [does this ruling apply]? If it be suggested: When a second discharge was observed [the objection would arise]: How could he then be included in 'the same law of uncleanness as one who emitted semen'? It is consequently obvious [that is was meant to apply] when a first discharge was observed;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When (cf. supra 34b ad fin.) he may well be compared to one who emitted semen. ');"><sup>2</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Niddah 70:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.