Commentary for Niddah 71:36

והלכתא כוותיה דרב בין לקולא בין לחומרא

and it is also to be restricted in agreement with Levi'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That where a discharge continued from within the clean days period into the clean one that follows, it is not regarded as clean blood since the continuous discharge is an indication that the unclean source had not yet closed up. ');">³²</span> R. Ashi stated: The law is in agreement with Rab both in his relaxations<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That where the discharge continued from within the unclean period into the clean one following, it is regarded as clean after the last unclean day, despite its continuity. ');">³³</span> and his restrictions.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This is explained in the Gemara infra. ');">³⁴</span> Meremar in his discourse laid down: The law is in agreement with Rab both in his relaxations<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That where the discharge continued from within the unclean period into the clean one following, it is regarded as clean after the last unclean day, despite its continuity. ');">³³</span> and restrictions.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That if the discharge was continuous from within the clean period into the unclean one following, it conveys uncleanness as if it had emanated from an unclean source. ');">³¹</span> And the law is in agreement with Rab both in his relaxations<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That where the discharge continued from within the unclean period into the clean one following, it is regarded as clean after the last unclean day, despite its continuity. ');">³³</span> and restrictions.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That if the discharge was continuous from within the clean period into the unclean one following, it conveys uncleanness as if it had emanated from an unclean source. ');">³¹</span>

Explore commentary for Niddah 71:36. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.