Commentary for Niddah 81:5
אמר רב הונא בריה דרב נתן
— R. Huna son of R. Nathan replied: No, the reference is to one so extracted in the case of a firstling. But is not the law of the firstling<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Viz., that a firstling extracted by means of a caesarean cut is not subject to the restrictions and sanctity of a firstling. ');"><sup>5</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Niddah 81:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.