Commentary for Niddah 9:22
דתניא
Was it not taught: In the case of all women their stains are unclean and also in the case of the women concerning whom the Sages ruled that it sufficed for them to reckon their period of uncleanness from the time they discovered the flow their stains are unclean; while R. Hanina b. Antigonus ruled, The women concerning whom the Sages ruled that it sufficed for them to reckon their uncleanness from the time they discovered the flow are not subject to the law of uncleanness of the stain? Now does not this mean that they are not subject at all to the law of uncleanness of the stain?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' How then could it be said supra that R. Hanina does uphold the law of the uncleanness of the stain? ');"><sup>19</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Niddah 9:22. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.