Commentary for Pesachim 122:10

וכ"ת ומאי חומריה דזריקה דלא מקבע פיגול אלא בזריקה

That there is no intention of eaters in respect to sprinkling.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' He need not sprinkle expressly for those who are registered, as the requirement of registration and eaters is stated in connection with slaughtering, v. supra ');">¹⁸</span> But R'Hisda [maintains,] On the contrary, [the Baraitha is to be explained] in the opposite direction. [Thus:] therefore it is stated, and all uncircumcised person[s] [shall not eat thereof]: if the whole of it [the registered company] is [in a state of] uncircumcision, it disqualifies it, but part thereof does not disqualify But [as for] sprinkling, even part thereof disqualifies it.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As his view supra.');">¹⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Pesachim 122:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.