Commentary for Pesachim 165:2

אמרו לו חטאת שנכנס דמה לפני ולפנים מנין אמר להן (ויקרא י, יח) הן לא הובא את דמה אל הקדש פנימה מכלל דאי נפיק איהי א"נ עייל דמה בשריפה

Said he to them, [From the verse] Behold, the blood of it was not brought into the sanctuary within,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. X, 18.');">²</span> whence it follows that if it [the sacrifice] went outside or if its blo entered within, it requires burning.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Now, since R. Jose the Galilean learns sacrifices for all time from Aaron's sin-offering, he evidently holds that for all time if the blood is brought within, it requires immediate burning without awaiting disfigurement, though the disqualification of the blood is like a disqualification through something else. Rabbah assumes that the same law viz., that it must be burnt without awaiting disfigurement, applies to the owner's defilement, though it is a disqualification through something else. Hence R. Jose the Galilean and R. Johanan b. Berokah say the same thing.');">³</span> But R'Johanan<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who does not include R. Jose he Galilean.');">⁴</span>

Explore commentary for Pesachim 165:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.