Commentary for Pesachim 227:7

מאי ד"א וכ"ת התם תרתי והכא חדא הכא נמי תרתי נינהו תדיר ושאינו תדיר תדיר קודם

Why state [another reason]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Is not the first sufficient?');">¹⁴</span> - [This:] for should you argue: there we have two [reasons], whereas here there is [only] one,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Beth Shammai give two reasons for their view, whereas only one supports beth Hillel's');">¹⁵</span> [I answer that] here also there are two, [for of] that which is constant and that which is not constant, that which is constant comes first.'

Explore commentary for Pesachim 227:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.