Commentary for Pesachim 82:4

איכא דאמרי חדא נמי לא לקי דלא מייחד לאויה כלאו דחסימה

Others say. He is not even flagellated once, because [Scripture] does not particularize its interdict, like the interdict of muzzling.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Deut. XXV, 4. This is an interdict explicitly forbidding a particular action, and this is the model of all interdicts the disregard of which involves flagellation, since it immediately follows the law of flagellation (ibid. v. 3) . But the interdict of 'eat not of it . . but roast with fire' doe not particularize any method of preparation as forbidden.');">⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Pesachim 82:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.