Commentary for Pesachim 88:3
והוא הדין לערלה בשתים
yet [Scripture] made the taste tantamount to the substance in his case; then kil'ayim, the prohibition of which is a permanent prohibition, and whose prohibition is a prohibition of [general] use, and there is no release from its prohibition, is it not logical that the taste should be treated as tantamount to the substance itself? And the same applies to 'orlah by two [arguments]!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Rashi: 'orlah too is forbidden for use and there is no release for its prohibition. The third argument however cannot be applied here, as 'orlah is not permanently forbidden, since it is permitted after three years. Tosaf. explains it differently. - But incidentally we see that 'an infusion' is required for a different purpose.');"><sup>5</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Pesachim 88:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.