Commentary for Sanhedrin 100:14

בבת כהן ולא בבת ישראל אימא אף בבת כהן

so also, when excludingthe priest's daughter, an arusah, from the penalty of an Israelite's daughter,an arusah, it must have been in order to impose a greaterpunishment.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Burning instead of stoning, making Lev. XXI,9 (quoted on p. 335, n. 3) refer both to a nesu'ah and an arusah. This Baraitha then will be the authority for R. Johanan,'s statement that R. Simeon maintained that both an arusah and a nesu'ah, if priests' daughters, were excepted from the penalty of an Israelite's daughter. ');">¹³</span>

Explore commentary for Sanhedrin 100:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.