Commentary for Sanhedrin 110:5
ומטמאה את בועלה לטמא משכב תחתון כעליון ניסת לכהן אוכלת בתרומה בא עליה אחד מן הפסולים פסלה מן הכהונה
Even as R. Hamnuna propounded: What if a Jew committed bestiality in ignorance; must there have been botha stumbling block and degradation [for the animal to be stoned] and in thiscase there is only degradation, but no sin; or perhaps for degradation alonewithout there having been a stumbling block [the animal isstoned]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' According to the latter explanation of the Mishnah, this problem is solved, whilst the first remains unanswered; but according to the first explanation, the first problem is solved, but not the second. As we cannot be certain which is correct, both so far are unsolved. ');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Sanhedrin 110:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.