Commentary for Sanhedrin 225:12

מיד (מלכים א יז, יג) ויאמר אליהו התשבי מתושבי גלעד חי ה' אלהי ישראל אם יהיה טל ומטר וגו' בעי רחמי והבו ליה אקלידא דמטרא וקם ואזל

It has been taught: In Abiram his firstborn: he was wicked, and so he could not have learnt from his death; but in his youngest son Segub he should have taken a lesson. What then did Abiram and Segub do?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It is now assumed that the meaning is: Hiel could not have deduced from Abiram's death that Joshua's curse was being fulfilled, because Abiram was wicked, to which fact Hiel might have attributed his death. But Segub was not evil, and therefore he should have known that his death was the result of his curse. Therefore the Talmud asks: what did Abiram and Segub do, i.e., how do we know that one was wicked and the other not (Maharsha). ');">²¹</span> — This is its meaning: From Abiram his firstborn that wicked man [Hiel] should have learnt [that its doors would be set up only with the death of] Segub his youngest son. Now, since it is written, in Abiram his firstborn, I know that Segub was his youngest:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For, as the verse informs us that Joshua's curse was fulfilled, it follows that Segub must have been his youngest. ');">²²</span>

Explore commentary for Sanhedrin 225:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.